|
August 16, 2002; Friday RIP potkettleblog: August 16, 2001 - August 16, 2002
These pages will no longer be updated. It was a lot of fun at first. Now it's not. There are other activities, web and nonweb, more rewarding and enjoyable. The archives will remain, for some reason. The potkettleblack.com index page will continue to be a public-consumption key to this domain. Keep tabs there, if keeping tabs interests you. I may make another site sometime with similar intent to potkettleblog, but with some particular and significant differences. Maybe. August 15, 2002; Thursday Logfile diving
Following kv's lead, I took a dive into the logfile... and surely he will be pleased to find that Googling the words "tubing apple river" brings back, in the #2 slot, the Making Contexts page with his Chortling Ethel entries. He may also delight in this one: falling of leaves+kindergarten . Having some time ago modified things to prevent Google from cataloging my images, and only recently having finally been purged from its image-search database, it seems that I now get to go through the same sort of process with Alta Vista. Somebody Googled "meat fairy". Such fame, such glory, to be number one on Google for the phrase "meat fairy." So far this month, the page with the most hits is the Natural Building Photo Gallery index, with 468. The most-visited potkettleblog entry is still "After all, catering for his comfort will provide you with immense personal satisfaction," with 232. A piddling 140 people have looked at the Webster pages, and none of them have hired me - little wonder. Monstrance has had a creepy amount of visits, especially considering that I haven't told anybody about it, and there's only two entries. Somehow, 44 people have stumbled into the Trap. I'm supposed to be doing some important stuff; not this. Responses - 3 (Commenting has been disabled.) I dislike hit counters and stats shit and search engines. I vi thru my logs, up close and personal, using intuition and generalization grounded in quick and dirty regex searches. I generally ignore my logs, although I did look at rhe songs when I had them posted (and was amazed that some had been downloaded *20* times - more are on the way, I'm sure, really). I also have entered 'the trap' more than once, 'cuz it makes me smile. As previously discussed in these pages, logs and stats are part of the fun for me. But mostly it's all getting less and less fun, all of it, in a feet-per-second-per-second accelerating freefall. August 11, 2002; Sunday Throttling
Potkettleblog has been running out of gas for some time. I'm sure you've noticed. Maybe it'll pick up again; but in the meantime, updates are most likely going to become even more sporadic. I'll try to make it a weekly. (By virtue of saying this, it may happen that all sorts of things will happen every day that I'll be just aching and anxious to share.) (By virtue of saying that, the preceding possibility is cancelled out.) (Maybe.) Oh, and I've finally become a chick. Saw My Big Fat Greek Wedding yesterday, and thought it was just terrific. Responses - 2 (Commenting has been disabled.) Just one thing I gotta know: Who is that using Shaw Cable? I'm stymied. keep working..we like your stuff. August 8, 2002; Thursday Here comes a narwhal
uglyfatkid, 8 August, 2002: Wow. If you play the B-52's jammin' tune "Rock Lobster" backwards, it clearly sounds like a warbled mess... that's right... a warbled mess of the DEVIL! SATAN SATAN SATAN SATAN! The B-52's must be stopped, if they haven't already broken up or died or something. Friggin' devil worshippers. Responses - 0 (Commenting has been disabled.) Monstrance
A receptacle in which the consecrated Host is exposed for adoration. August 6, 2002; Tuesday View from Reagan National
![]() Responses - 0 (Commenting has been disabled.) Yams and 'nanners
"Have you ever seen a Malaysian woman spot a barbecued sweet potato from afar? It's embarrassing." "Is that a Banana, Bananier Nain, Canbur, Curro or Plantain in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?" a la Jeem Responses - 2 (Commenting has been disabled.) (view source) Why is that?
Is it because nothing ever happens in my life? Is it because I so jealously guard my privacy? Is it because I've forgotten how to type? Is it because I've slipped into a coma? Is it because there's so much good stuff on TV? Is it because so awfully much happens all the time that I don't know where to begin? Well? Responses - 3 (Commenting has been disabled.) This No, just a little commentary on the spottiness and overall banality of my entries here. Then again, you might be on to something... Better the banality of everyday existence than shrill & constant harping on current events. This all reminds me of a poem. August 3, 2002; Saturday ... younger and more beautiful women keep popping up every day and you just get one day older and droopier, he said
Last year's December 13th entry, After all, catering for his comfort will provide you with immense personal satisfaction, was voted "Most Likely To Be Googled" by its high school graduating class. Occasionally people comment on it. This morning I answered the two most recent comments with a comment of my own. Personally, I disagree with the last couple of comments. But I also respect the fact that they chose not to hide behind abject anonymity. They both signed their comments - probably with their real names - and, in Terry's case, included an email address as well. Good on ya both for having at least some measure of the courage of your convictions. However, I think Janet may have missed some things completely in her reading of the original text. Does she really think that what her husband has to say is always just plain more important that anything she ever has on her mind? Is she really not going to complain if he starts staying out all night? Does she really think that she has no right to question his judgement under any circumstance? Poor Janet. I absolutely agree with her statement, "If more women respected and made an effort for their husband, perhaps the divorce rate would not be so high." I don't understand, though, why she left out the other part: That if more men respected and made an effort for their wives, that would also lower the divorce rate. As for Terry: I hardly know where to begin. What I do know is that anything I have to say is going to be a waste of time and breath on him. His mind is already made up; and he obviously doesn't have an understanding of how sinister things can be for women underneath his misspelled christian-fundamentalist platitudes. I grew up through 12 years of private religious school; religion classes every day; chapel three times a week; church and Sunday school every Sunday; two years of confirmation classes on Saturdays. I've had a lot of exposure to the bible, and consequently it's very hard for me to take it literally. There's some good stuff in there, sure! I've never found any religion that wasn't rooted in good stuff - initially, at least. There's an illustrative collection of biblical inconsistencies, absurdities, obscenities and atrocities at the Closet Atheist site. (Don't get me wrong - there are atheists who are every bit as annoying as some religious fundamentalists.) All of the listings there are linked to the pertinent texts at biblegateway. Some of them are weak and smack of axe-grinding, but a lot of them are significant. Thus ends my ad hominem attack. Your host, who believes that if intelligence, individuality and free will are gifts from the lord, he is probably pleased when we use them - though I can't absolutely say so for certain, because how can any man ever know the mind of any person's god? Any who presume to are fools. Aug 3, '02; 9:55 AM Responses - 3 (Commenting has been disabled.) One last parting shot (which I fully expect to be removed or edited). I thank the mysterious person who complimented me on my leaving my name, however, they forgot to leave theirs (Luke 6: 41-42) so I will just have to call her, "Missy" (for mysterious). Missy, I think you meant to say "His mind is already made up, and he obviously doesn't have an understanding of how sinister things can be for a woman underneath his ***misspelled**** (Don't you mean misplaced, Missy?) fundamentalist-christian platitudes." Since you are the expert on the Scriptures after your 12 years please explain why you couldn't realize that what your teachers were teaching and what was written in the Scriptures were two different things (Acts 17:10-11)? I saw people who slept through 4 years of school and now those people are called doctors. Just because you put in your time doesn't mean you know anything about the Scriptures. You had your opportunity to explain "the sinister" to me but instead you took us on a wild goose chase trying to sound profound. May have fooled the superficial people who would believe that "Fascinating Womanhood" (both for and against) was straight out of the Scriptures. By the way these are not my doctrines but God's doctrines. The Scriptures talk about the proper hierachy for men and women. It goes as such: God ( the head), Christ, man and then woman ( 1 Corinthians 11:3). Now you understand why the feminists hate God and godly men because God has seen fit to place women under the charge of godly men, not the effeminate men or women haters that prey on the women of today. If you would read the Scriptures you would see that 99% of the churches (including your PRIVATE school) don't match the definition of Christianity. Since you didn't understand the Scriptures, then you wouldn't be able to spot the fakes. That is why they have experts appraise diamonds because they know and understand diamonds and hence can determine which is valuble and which is fake. The imposters of Christianity are the ones who steal from their parish, are adulterers, child molesters or just the plain liars about the Scriptures (1 Cor 6: 9-11). Now you know why Missy is seeking foreign gods because the fakes taught nothing about the One True God. That is why Missy is so unhappy in life and her relationships with men. The more she follows the doctrines of men the more unhappy she becomes. Yet pride prevents her from admitting her error and seeking God. You see Missy worships the false god "I". "I" is found at the beginning of idol and in the middle of pride. Finally, I would like to thank Missy for the blessing. What blessing you ask? The blessing from painting me with the same brush as the fakes: These words will come to mind at the time of your next broken relationship. So ends the lesson (final posting) from an unworthy servant of the One True God, Terry Dean, Nemmers Your comments won't be removed or edited, as you seemed to hope they would be. I think that there's always going to be plenty that offends you enough to fuel the fires of your smug self-satisfaction, no matter how narrowly blindered your field of vision is. You don't need to bait me so crassly. Me? I'm the mysterious person you called "Missy." I'm the person you said is "so unhappy in life and her relationships with men." This is my website - which is why I sign my comments as "your host" - and I did forget to dispense with that jocular tradition and use my name... which is not a secret. My name is Mark Piepkorn; same last name as renowned Christian scholar Carl Piepkorn. No relation, though... it's just the supreme being showing you a little of that famous sense of humor. And for what it's worth, I'm happily married to a woman I don't subjugate. Although "misplaced" is also apropos, as you suggest, I wrote "misspelled" and that's what I meant. You read the bible literally; try giving me the same courtesy. And try using a spellchecker, too; it's easy, and maybe it'll help the people you're trying to reach take you a little more seriously. You might also try to tone down your heavy-handed self-righteousness. You were utterly off base about me, yet you spoke with complete conviction... as if you knew everything about me, when in fact your most basic assumptions were entirely wrong. You fell terribly short in that particular leap of faith. In the face of such egregious error, why would anyone think you know what you're talking about on any topic? You wrote, about me: "Since you are the expert on the Scriptures..." Uh-uh. Unlike you, I'm not trying to pass myself off as an expert. I was relating the primary basis of my relevant experience and knowledge. And I'm not trying to say that I know the mind of anybody's god, as you claim you do by your words. That absolutely stuns me. Doesn't that make you that very thing? Is that what you think you are? God? How many sects of Christianity are there? How many of them base their beliefs on the Christian bible? How is it that you presume to have a stronger link to the mind and heart of divinity than anybody else? Why do you think that you're in a position to judge others - particularly when it's expressly forbidden by your faith? You wrote, "If you would read the Scriptures you would see that 99% of the churches (including your PRIVATE school) don't match the definition of Christianity." Bad news, Terry: you haven't done anything to show me that you match the definition of Christianity, either. Terry wrote, "You see Missy worships the false god 'I'. 'I' is found at the beginning of idol and in the middle of pride." Terry's point, hardly worthy of ridicule to begin with, is quickly obscured when it's noted that "I" is also the first letter in the transliteration of the name Jehova from its original Hebrew. Holy men of God spake and wrote as they were moved by the Holy Spirit. Some translators, though, use JHVH, while still others use YHVH. Uh-oh... you mean the Christian bible wasn't originally written in English? You mean to tell me it was written by about 50 different people over more than 1500 years (starting more than a thousand years before the Christian era) in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek? That there's only one original biblical book actually extant, and biblical scholars acknowledge that some English-language bibles are translations of translations of revisions of revisions of revisions of material often rooted in centuries-old oral tradition? Well, good thing there's never been any errors in any of those goings-on. Uh-oh, you mean there's been errors in translations? Well, that doesn't mean anything because it's not the words on the page that are important, it's the... uh-oh, that negates just about everything Terry's said. Nuts. Blessed are you when men hate you, and ostracise you, and cast insults at you, and spurn your name as evil, for the sake of the Son of Man. Clearly this exchange of sexism ideas is a personal thing. We should leave Jesus out of it, so to speak; at least as an excuse, or a weapon. KV - same private schools as Mark, different outcome; same Bible as Terry, different assumptions. Trust me, everything can be disproven, everybody's everything is a lie. We are 100% fallible. We are mules and the truth is our carrot and the string on the carrot is yellow yarn tied to the stick in the Master's hand. Master holds no whip, only The Truth On A Stick. It is like the invisible dog that was so popular back in a day. The carrot is not to deceive or manipulate or tease; it's just that we "can't handle the truth." It is held out so we can see it, so we at least know it's there. And whether we're told or we figure it out on our own, we know the flame in the middle of the idea of the truth is love. Maybe you think, "What's wrong with you, you passive motherf___er?" I do not beat my wife, but I am more often than not, I think, in little ways, unpleasant. I'll try harder. Love, August 2, 2002; Friday Sometimes I'm inspired, but sometimes I'm paralyzed
Responses - 0 (Commenting has been disabled.) A positively stupid amount of heat, and ozone to boot
Yet another Code Red day in DC. Temperature: middle 90s to 100sAnd - oh, boy! - best of all: For the 2002 ozone season, the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments has added a new designation, "Code Purple" for days when air quality is "very unhealthy" - worse than Code Red. current condition, and forecast: Responses - 0 (Commenting has been disabled.) A coffee-colored piece of sculpture, he said
"... considered to have come from the hand of Phidias, since it was not possible that any other artist, of any epoch, could have copied nature with such faultless accuracy. The figure was that of a man without skin; with every vein, artery, muscle, every fibre and tendon and tissue of the human frame, represented in minute detail. It looked natural, because somehow it looked as if it were in pain. A skinned man would be likely to look that way, unless his attention were occupied with some other matter. It was a hideous thing, and yet there was a fascination about it somewhere. I am very sorry I saw it, because I shall always see it, now. I shall dream of it, sometimes. I shall dream that it is resting its corded arms on the bed's head and looking down on me with its dead eyes; I shall dream that it is stretched between the sheets with me and touching me with its exposed muscles and its stringy cold legs." Eww. Mark Twain, The Innocents Abroad, Volume I; 1869. Responses - 3 (Commenting has been disabled.) But, why? Why, when you find biology so distasteful? A change of heart? |
![]() |
|||||||||